Enough is Enough

February 28, 2007

Shame on Gore, revisited

Filed under: Uncategorized — perr1ker5h @ 2:38 pm

When word first surfaced back in August that Al Gore was not as green as he made himself out to be, I wrote him a little note, sharing my disappointment. Now it’s all re-surfacing…so I’ll just point you back to my earlier blog and say “ditto.” Gore has a well-deserved Oscar in his hands, but he’s got a lot of people to answer to.

Ironically, “W” has solar panels on his roof and recycles the water at his Crawford Ranch. Rarely will I cut that man any slack, but for his personal green efforts in TX, I applaud him. Perhaps he should drag Jimmy Carter’s old solar panels out of storage and reinstall them on the White House roof!

February 27, 2007

The great diaper debate

Filed under: Uncategorized — perr1ker5h @ 3:09 pm

Our three year old son is still proudly wearing diapers, and there is no inkling of interest in sitting on the potty anytime soon. I realize that these things can change over night, and that some kids need more of a nudge than others. But to be honest, I LOVE diapers. They’re easy, and don’t require you to drive around with a potty in your car, or find the nearest toilet every time you walk in a building, or pull over to the side of the road for a quick pee behind a tree, or clean up accidents all over your house, your vehicle or any other place you might visit. So I’m not nudging. I do occasionally ask if he wants to sit on the potty, and he always says “no” and goes about his business. Every so often I pull out his Lightening McQueen underpants to see if they provide any inspiration, but they never do. He likes his diapers…they’re the one “baby” thing he has left and he’s just not ready to give them up.

In my defense, I’m not a pushover about many things with my kids. When I thought our son needed to lose his pacifier, we took it away cold turkey, and replaced it with “Little Black Fan” (literally, a small black electric fan that he adores)…his treat from the paci-fairy. I’m a drill sergeant when it comes to sleep training, and our kids ate what we were eating as soon as they could chew it. But for some reason, I just can’t get all tough-love on the potty training thing with our second child.

Our daughter was a completely different story. She potty trained with relative ease at 27 months, and was dry at night before she turned 3. Once she caught a glimpse of big girl panties, she never looked back. She also wore cloth diapers for almost her entire first year…perhaps that made it easier for her? With our son, we tried cloth and it lasted all of about 2 months. Again…I whimped out and went straight to Luvs.

But now that I’ve gone all earth-mother, I’m starting to feel a little guilty about our dependence on diapers. I just read this article today on the NRDC’s “This Green Life” site about diapers, and I’m thinking I’m going to have to step it up. This article suggests that we start potty training our kids immediately–at birth, when they’re newborns, when they can’t even freakin’ hold their heads up. So, I was three years late and about 6000 Luvs short of accomplishing that goal. The NRDC article also revisits the whole cloth vs. disposable arguement. I could consider going back to cloth at this point as a way of motivating my stubborn kid. Or I could consider something like the gDiaper, which consists of colorful cloth pants and snap-in liners with inserts made primarily of fluffed wood pulp. But somehow I don’t think their Med/Lg size refers to a 35 pounder who knows his colors and shapes and recognizes his letters.

Time for me to shake off my lazies and get this kid sitting on the toilet. I’m not above a bribe…M&Ms anyone?

February 21, 2007

Buying stuff to save the world?

Filed under: Uncategorized — perr1ker5h @ 10:50 pm

Eco-friendly products are all the rage right now. I just picked up the latest copy of Domino Magazine (which I happen to like quite a bit because they often feature kitchen makeovers with Ikea cabinets that are affordable and oh-so-cool and give me hope that some day, I, too, can have a kitchen without red stickers on the backsplash that cover ugly vegetable tiles from 1979) at my sister’s house and the entire issue is devoted to companies and products with eco-cred. Want to feel better about yourself? Buy recycled bamboo plates instead of paper Chinet. Want to shed the guilt of driving a gas guzzler to the mall? While there, stock up on eco-bliss such as Alpaca slippers or CD storage boxes made from recycled cotton in the rural outskirts of Delhi. Does anyone else think this all seems a bit ridiculous? I’m all for doing my part and trying to ease up on the earth (see previous entries with details of six months of consumer-free living), but, at the same time I readily admit that I’m a sucker for smell-good, look-good, feel-good stuff that claims to be made in a responsible way. But really…do I need a water-powered digital alarm clock to ease my consumer-driven guilt?

Marketers have tapped in to this new found green craze and are eager to sell us their wares. Rather than eating all of this up, perhaps we should all just take a step back and ask whether we really need it in the first place. Yes–if you’re out to purchase something that you do need, then by all means, go green, baby. But if you, like me, are feeling sucked in by the tractor beam of savvy marketers out to take our money just because we’re trying to be responsible citizens, then keep in mind that sometimes, by NOT buying, you’re doing way more to save the world.

February 16, 2007

Eco-freak-o

Filed under: Uncategorized — perr1ker5h @ 4:23 pm

Here’s a little excerpt from my Neat Freak Newsletter in February. If you’d like to sign up, email me at newsletter@neat-freak.com and just say “sign me up!”.

NeatFreak News: February 2007
I recently took an Ecological Footprint test and realized that if everyone lived like me, it would take 3.5 Earths to support the human race. (You can view your own Ecological Footprint by clicking here.) So I’m now on a mission to ease up on the earth and I aim to practice what I preach in my organizing work as well.

Whether you consider yourself a carbon-a-holic (like me!) or you’re living off the grid, here are a few eco-friendly organizing tips that might simplify your life, improve your organization and help mama-earth along the way.

REDUCE: The idea is simple…attempt to live with less! But I’m here to tell you, that’s easier said than done. The following questions may help you think before you buy:

*Do I really need this?
*Where was it made and how did it get here?
*Can I recycle the box or the packaging?
*Would I buy this if it were NOT on sale?
*Do I look fantastic in it?
*Where am I going to put it once I take it home?

Hmmmmm, do I know how to suck the fun out of a trip to the mall, or what? But by simply asking yourself these questions, you might find you purchase a little less and have less STUFF to organize.

REUSE: Here are a few of my favorite reuse ideas for getting a second life out of everyday items:

*Use empty tissue boxes to hold plastic grocery bags you accumulate, then reuse your bags for quick cleanups around the house.
*Reuse old t-shirts or cloth burp cloths as cleaning rags rather than paper towels—they’re more absorbent and they’re reusable!
*Baby food jars make great containers for small items such as thumbtacks, screws, nails or rubberbands.
*Use the “free” address labels you receive from non-profit solicitations to mark books that you loan to friends, or to label casserole dishes and serving pieces you take to a potluck dinner.
*Turn this year’s holiday cards into next year’s gift tags by cutting colorful squares from the cards, punching a hole in them and voila…you’re ready to tag gifts in 2007!

RECYCLE: My favorite new way to recycle…host a swap party! This is a great way to recycle items you no longer need but still have good life left in them. I recently attended a book swap night and swapped out 5 books I read and loved for 5 new books I couldn’t wait to crack open. No money exchanges hands—you just swap a few items and everyone leaves happy. In addition to books, you could host a clothing or purse swap, a sports equipment swap or an “unusual wedding gift” swap.

February 15, 2007

Pick your poison

Filed under: Uncategorized — perr1ker5h @ 9:26 pm

After I sang the praises of CFLs, and patted myself on the back for being a good citizen of the earth, I flipped a switch today and one of the swirly things had already burned out. Minutes before, I was sitting in my car listening to NPR and heard a story stating that CFL’s contain mercury, so they can’t just be tossed in the garbage can when you’re finished with them. The hazardous materials inside the bulbs must be disposed of properly or we’ll end up polluting the landfills with toxic mercury (not to mention exposing sanitation workers to toxic levels of mercury…or our children if they happened to get a hold of one!)…and that doesn’t sound like such a good idea!

Why does being good have to be so damn hard? Thanks to my clients and their collections of hazardous waste or tech products that must be properly disposed of, I frequent the city dump and our local hazardous waste shed WAY more than the average person. So I don’t mind collecting my spent CFLs and getting rid of them properly. But what about the other regular CFL-using Americans who don’t spend their afternoons hanging around the dump? Ikea is the only company actively recycling the swirl bulbs at this point. Wal-Mart, Lowes & Home Depot are going to have to step up to the plate and do their part. Surely they can come up with a handy container to toss these bulbs into. How about a little goodwill and good PR?

If you expect people to make the switch, then you’re going to have to make it easy on us. At this point, you’ve got to pick your poison–wasteful incandescent lights that you can pitch in the trash, or mercury-filled CFLs that require a less-than-convenient trip to the smelly side of town.

February 11, 2007

Happy birthday, big boy

Filed under: Uncategorized — perr1ker5h @ 11:04 pm

My “baby” turned three last weekend. Here’ s how the party planning went:

 ”What do you want to do for your birthday, big guy?”

“Nothing. I don’t need anything. Just a cake with a fan on it.”

The simplicity that comes with this age certainly doesn’t last long. I recognize that in the blink of an eye, he’ll be asking for a Playstation and some punk skater clothes. Big sis is getting a trip to New York City for her birthday. She originally requested a Pump-It-Up Party in Raleigh, including  her entire kindergarten class. I figured by the time we entertained and fed all of those kids and put together some kind of party favor, we’d spend way more than a trip to NYC since we have frequent flyer miles and a free place to stay with Uncle Rogan. We’re hitting the American Girl Doll store and the ferris wheel at Toys R’ Us. Plus a boat tour to see the Statue of Liberty and most likely, a musical matinee. This all seems mighty grand for a girl about to turn SIX! How will we ever top it?

February 10, 2007

Dinnertime Dilemma

Filed under: Uncategorized — perr1ker5h @ 9:17 pm

I’m reading a fantastic book that I highly recommend, Michael Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. Never would I have imagined that reading about farm subsidies, biomass, ethanol, and high-fructose corn syrup could keep me up at night, turning the pages well past my bedtime. But this book has also left me feeling totally confused when it comes to making my weekly grocery shopping list. Who knew that most organic farms were really industrial farms and that their cows are still force fed corn (albeit organic corn)? I naively bought in to the pictures of the happy cows munching on grass, thinking that my organic milk came straight from that pastoral farm scene on the jug. I also convinced myself that eating organic was better for the environment (and I know that for the most part, this is still true)–but I now realize I have to take this a step further and purchase my produce locally to really be doing my part. I also knew that high-fructose corn syrup was a major ingredient in a number of foods, but now that I’ve started looking more closely, I feel like I need to put my family on a permanent diet of home grown kale and water and avoid everything else. Sorry kiddo’s…no more cereal bars! This book has made me really re-think giving up vegetarianism when I got pregnant with my son (and let me tell you, when I went back on meat, I went back hardcore…hot dogs and North Carolina barbecue were, and still are, high on my request list!). And it has even made me skeptical of Whole Foods and other “Big Organic” players in the food chain.

I’m a meal planner by nature. I love to spend my Sunday afternoons surrounded by cookbooks and my calendar, planning out our dinners for the week so I can shop alone in peace, for an hour or two, and get most of what we need. I’m also a bit of a bargain shopper. I don’t use coupons, but I do tend to look for deals and will take advantage of a buy-one-get-one-free offer when I can. And I love how Whole Foods makes me feel–but I also find that I leave there $100 poorer with enough stuff to make a meal and a half.

Now that I’m reading Pollan’s book, I’m feeling paralyzed by meal planning. I try to “cook” most nights, although I admit to becoming more Rachel Ray-like now that I have two kids…pulling together a few simple ingredients, taking shortcuts where I can (where would I be without rotisserie chicken?), and enjoying a lot of one-pot meals. Pollan has me reading the labels on my “shortcuts” now, and I just can’t stomach the thought of adding that stuff to our food.

We’re fortunate to have an amazing farmer’s market in Carrboro and I’m pledging right now to frequent it this spring/summer/fall. I’ve also started purchasing our milk from our local dairy–at least I know it wasn’t trucked across the country prior to moving in to our fridge. Pollan shares these other recommendations that I’ll include here, just in case you, too, are feeling fretful about food:

“1. Eat food. Though in our current state of confusion, this is much easier said than done. So try this: Don’t eat anything your great-great-grandmother wouldn’t recognize as food. (Sorry, but at this point Moms are as confused as the rest of us, which is why we have to go back a couple of generations, to a time before the advent of modern food products.) There are a great many foodlike items in the supermarket your ancestors wouldn’t recognize as food (Go-Gurt? Breakfast-cereal bars? Nondairy creamer?); stay away from these.

2. Avoid even those food products that come bearing health claims. They’re apt to be heavily processed, and the claims are often dubious at best. Don’t forget that margarine, one of the first industrial foods to claim that it was more healthful than the traditional food it replaced, turned out to give people heart attacks. When Kellogg’s can boast about its Healthy Heart Strawberry Vanilla cereal bars, health claims have become hopelessly compromised. (The American Heart Association charges food makers for their endorsement.) Don’t take the silence of the yams as a sign that they have nothing valuable to say about health.

3. Especially avoid food products containing ingredients that are a) unfamiliar, b) unpronounceable c) more than five in number–or that contain high-fructose corn syrup.None of these characteristics are necessarily harmful in and of themselves, but all of them are reliable markers for foods that have been highly processed.

4. Get out of the supermarket whenever possible. You won’t find any high-fructose corn syrup at the farmer’s market; you also won’t find food harvested long ago and far away. What you will find are fresh whole foods picked at the peak of nutritional quality. Precisely the kind of food your great-great-grandmother would have recognized as food.

5. Pay more, eat less. The American food system has for a century devoted its energies and policies to increasing quantity and reducing price, not to improving quality. There’s no escaping the fact that better food–measured by taste or nutritional quality (which often correspond)–costs more, because it has been grown or raised less intensively and with more care. Not everyone can afford to eat well in America, which is shameful, but most of us can: Americans spend, on average, less than 10 percent of their income on food, down from 24 percent in 1947, and less than the citizens of any other nation. And those of us who can afford to eat well should. Paying more for food well grown in good soils–whether certified organic or not–will contribute not only to your health (by reducing exposure to pesticides) but also to the health of others who might not themselves be able to afford that sort of food: the people who grow it and the people who live downstream, and downwind, of the farms where it is grown.

“Eat less” is the most unwelcome advice of all, but in fact the scientific case for eating a lot less than we currently do is compelling. “Calorie restriction” has repeatedly been shown to slow aging in animals, and many researchers (including Walter Willett, the Harvard epidemiologist) believe it offers the single strongest link between diet and cancer prevention. Food abundance is a problem, but culture has helped here, too, by promoting the idea of moderation. Once one of the longest-lived people on earth, the Okinawans practiced a principle they called “Hara Hachi Bu”: eat until you are 80 percent full. To make the “eat less” message a bit more palatable, consider that quality may have a bearing on quantity: I don’t know about you, but the better the quality of the food I eat, the less of it I need to feel satisfied. All tomatoes are not created equal.

6. Eat mostly plants, especially leaves. Scientists may disagree on what’s so good about plants–the antioxidants? Fiber? Omega-3s?–but they do agree that they’re probably really good for you and certainly can’t hurt. Also, by eating a plant-based diet, you’ll be consuming far fewer calories, since plant foods (except seeds) are typically less “energy dense” than the other things you might eat. Vegetarians are healthier than carnivores, but near vegetarians (“flexitarians”) are as healthy as vegetarians. Thomas Jefferson was on to something when he advised treating meat more as a flavoring than a food.

7. Eat more like the French. Or the Japanese. Or the Italians. Or the Greeks. Confounding factors aside, people who eat according to the rules of a traditional food culture are generally healthier than we are. Any traditional diet will do: if it weren’t a healthy diet, the people who follow it wouldn’t still be around. True, food cultures are embedded in societies and economies and ecologies, and some of them travel better than others: Inuit not so well as Italian. In borrowing from a food culture, pay attention to how a culture eats, as well as to what it eats. In the case of the French paradox, it may not be the dietary nutrients that keep the French healthy (lots of saturated fat and alcohol?!) so much as the dietary habits: small portions, no seconds or snacking, communal meals–and the serious pleasure taken in eating. (Worrying about diet can’t possibly be good for you.) Let culture be your guide, not science.

8. Cook. And if you can, plant a garden. To take part in the intricate and endlessly interesting processes of providing for our sustenance is the surest way to escape the culture of fast food and the values implicit in it: that food should be cheap and easy; that food is fuel and not communion. The culture of the kitchen, as embodied in those enduring traditions we call cuisines, contains more wisdom about diet and health than you are apt to find in any nutrition journal or journalism. Plus, the food you grow yourself contributes to your health long before you sit down to eat it. So you might want to think about putting down this article now and picking up a spatula or hoe.

9. Eat like an omnivore. Try to add new species, not just new foods, to your diet. The greater the diversity of species you eat, the more likely you are to cover all your nutritional bases. That of course is an argument from nutritionism, but there is a better one, one that takes a broader view of “health.” Biodiversity in the diet means less monoculture in the fields. What does that have to do with your health? Everything. The vast monocultures that now feed us require tremendous amounts of chemical fertilizers and pesticides to keep from collapsing. Diversifying those fields will mean fewer chemicals, healthier soils, healthier plants and animals and, in turn, healthier people. It’s all connected, which is another way of saying that your health isn’t bordered by your body and that what’s good for the soil is probably good for you, too.”

(this is taken directly from Pollan’s article in The New York Times Magazine, Sunday, January 28, 2007)

Gotta run get busy planting my garden. Man, so much to worry about, so little time!

February 6, 2007

Moving over to the dark side

Filed under: Uncategorized — perr1ker5h @ 11:34 pm

As I’ve mentioned before, we’ve never had cable TV (with the exception of the few months of free cable when we first moved into this house and the cable was still connected). A few weeks ago, on a snowy day, a Time Warner rep stopped by our house and offered us a deal we couldn’t refuse. For $15 less than we currently pay for phone and DSL service (that we’ve NEVER been happy with!), we could have digital phone service, high speed internet AND basic cable television (enabling us to ditch our rabbit ears and pick up NBC and FOX). Clearly, this guy had me hooked at hello and I signed up for the service. Less money + The Office…who could say no?

After a number of failed attempts, Time Warner finally installed all of this technological goodness today (the fact that most of this service has been available since the 90’s is not lost on us). Instead of the 12 cable channels we thought we were getting, we’re now back up to 80. Did the installation guy think he was doing us a favor? Was he not familiar with the Red Dawn experience of 2005? I’m just not sure we’re capable of responsibly handling that much television at our house. We’re already seeking ways to block out Nickelodeon and The Disney Channel from the kids, as well as a good 80% of the rest of the channels from our own eager eyes. We’re weak, I tell you, weak!

I have to wonder why I fear cable so much. Will it expose my kids to more commercial television, causing them to ask for stuff like Lucky Charms and burn-your-hands-off Easy Bake Ovens? Will I get sucked into remodeling shows on HGTV that will cause me to despise my home, attempt to gut it and start from scratch? Will Carter be lost forever to ESPN 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5? Yes, yes and yes! We’re powerless to the hypnotic glow of the television and are surely better off without it. I’m giving us 30 days to see how we hold up, and if all of the above come true, I’m cutting the cord. Please hold me to it!

February 4, 2007

Can CFLs really change the world?

Filed under: Uncategorized — perr1ker5h @ 9:54 pm

Topping practically every eco-friendly to-do list is the suggestion to change from regular lightbulbs to compact fluorescent lightbulbs (CFLs) in your home and office. In my desperate attempt to green-up our family and walk a little more gently on the earth, I did just that. I started forking out the extra money at Lowe’s (roughly $3 per bulb, compared to $.30 per bulb for regular lights) to purchase compact fluorescent “swirl” lights for every socket in our home. I felt pretty good about this, but in the back of my head I wondered “really, is this making much of a difference? Could something so simple change the world?”

Then a friend sent this article from FastCompany, and I’m feeling like a freakin’ environmental hero! The following stats should have you running, not walking, to the store to buy up these bulbs:

“Compact fluorescents emit the same light as classic incandescents but use 75% or 80% less electricity.

What that means is that if every one of 110 million American households bought just one ice-cream-cone bulb, took it home, and screwed it in the place of an ordinary 60-watt bulb, the energy saved would be enough to power a city of 1.5 million people. One bulb swapped out, enough electricity saved to power all the homes in Delaware and Rhode Island. In terms of oil not burned, or greenhouse gases not exhausted into the atmosphere, one bulb is equivalent to taking 1.3 million cars off the roads.

That’s the law of large numbers–a small action, multiplied by 110 million.

The single greatest source of greenhouse gases in the United States is power plants–half our electricity comes from coal plants. One bulb swapped out: enough electricity saved to turn off two entire power plants–or skip building the next two.

Just one swirl per home. The typical U.S. house has between 50 and 100 “sockets” (astonish yourself: Go count the bulbs in your house). So what if we all bought and installed two ice-cream-cone bulbs? Five? Fifteen?”

Says David Goldstein, a PhD physicist, MacArthur “genius” fellow, and senior energy scientist with the Natural Resources Defense Council: “This could be just what the world’s been waiting for, for the last 20 years.”

–FastCompany, September 2006

Oprah’s on board, using and promoting CFL’s, and you know Al Gore wants you to buy them. Hell, Leonardo DiCaprio makes them look downright sexy. Even WalMart is pricing them low to encourage everyone to make the switch. All of the “cool” kids are doing it. What are you waiting for?

Blog at WordPress.com.